4.04.08
EVALUATION & AUTHENTICATION OF RESOURCES
Lecture.
Today's lecture was all about 'Finding Quality Information on the Web'. Firstly we all discussed the answers to the questions below in the lecture. These were questions that need to be considered when searching for information on the Internet.
This is a screen capture of the 1st Lecture Slide.
As a group we discuss that certain web sites may not be fit for use or fit for a certain purpose.
I learnt that there is no control on some web sites. Some have no publisher, and anyone can go
on there are change information or add to the site. A lot of sites a lot are no relative to the topic you have searched.
In the lecture slides there were some examples on how to evaluate the WWW.
These slides included some important topics to consider. These were:
Accuracy- standards, error free, is there an editor?
Authority- Is the page signed? Is there an author? Last updated date?
Objectivity- Does is show a bias/sway of opinion? Is there advertising on the page?
Currency- Is it recent? Current links?
Coverage- In depth material? What does the page have to offer? Topics covered?
Authentic Consideration- Who wrote it? Name/ Position?
Lastly Helen spoke of using you first impression to quickly evaluate a web site. Quickly scan through then content and compare with ease-of-use. A question to ask yourself is What is the visual feel?
Your first impression can quickly determine whether a site is authentic and fit for your purpose.
Tutorial.
The tutorial was all about how to evaluate and recognise an authentic site.
We were also given the Group Assignment and chose groups of three for it.
Task 1.
Our first task was to visit the site http://www.ithaca.edu/library/training/think.html and look at the strategies or criteria for evaluating a web site
This is a screen capture that I edited in paint that highlights the 6 main suggestions to evaluating a website.I found that to 6 criteria were the same shown to us in the lecture slide this morning.
Including Accuracy, Objectivity, Currency, Coverage and Authentic Consideration.
These 6 suggestions are things to consider. They are very important and I believe are very helpful. For example, if the information found on a website is no recent and does not show a date that is was last updated, the facts may no longer be true, as things change with time.
Task.2
The next task was to go to the website http://www.ithaca.edu/library/training/think60.html
This site listed 5 different websites. We were asked to chose two and evaluate them thoroughly.
The first one I chose was called 'American Cultural History: 1960 - 1969.'
At first glance to site looked authentic. It included facts about the decade, and dots points of other information you could find on the site. After scrolling through the site, i found it have an author, a last updated date (which was December 2006, which would make the sites information quite recent). It also had details about Copyright, and lots of pictures, headings and bullet points. I do believe this web site is authentic and would be very useful to some one who was researching American Cultural History.
This is a screen capture of the American Cultural History site.
The second site I chose to look at was called 'The Sixties Project.'
My first thoughts from having a quick look at the site where that I didn't believe it was authentic. The home page was dull and not very inviting. To me it didn't look like there was going to be an obvious author and details to prove it was a fit for use site. Underneath the main heading there are 3 sub-headings. These were links to certain parts of the site. These headings were:
Scholars
Sixties Survivors
Casual Surfers
After looking carefully on the home page I did find an author and contact information, including a postal address and an email address. Underneath this in really small writing was the last updated date, which was January 1999.
Although this site did seem to be authentic, I don't believe it would be very relevant to a topic. The information had been edited 9 years ago. This information may not be very reliable anymore and not true.
This is a screen capture of the Sixties Project Home Page.
Reading.
On Blackboard there is no reading that needed to be included in my learning log.